We'd like to use analytics cookies to understand which symbols people look up, so we know what to research next. They are not used for advertising and we set none of them unless you say yes. What we store.
Two Chinese food schemes of different strictness, routinely read as interchangeable.
The organic scheme is the stricter of the two and prohibits synthetic inputs outright. The green food scheme permits limited use of them under controlled conditions, and exists as an achievable step between conventional production and organic certification. A product carrying the green food mark has met a real standard, and it is not the organic one.
The stricter scheme it is routinely mistaken for.
Drawn from the visual attributes recorded for each symbol. Only traits the two records disagree about are listed.
| Trait | China Green Food mark | China Organic Product mark |
|---|---|---|
| Built from | circles and plants | circles, plants and number like |
| China Green Food mark | China Organic Product mark | |
|---|---|---|
| Synthetic inputs | Permitted within limits. | Prohibited. |
| Position in the scheme ladder | Intermediate. | Strictest. |
| Relationship (from Symbolwise's records) | Commonly confused with China Organic Product mark — The stricter scheme it is routinely mistaken for. | Commonly confused with China Green Food mark — The less strict scheme it is routinely mistaken for. |
GB/T national standards for public information graphical symbols
Standardization Administration of China · retrieved 2026-08-25
The Chinese national standards administration, cited for the identity and meaning of Chinese public information and road symbols. Not cited for enforcement or for the law of any province.
Biodegradable is close to meaningless on its own: almost everything degrades eventually, and the claim names no timescale and no conditions. Compostable states both. That gap is why unqualified biodegradability claims are restricted in several jurisdictions, and why a compostable mark is worth more than a biodegradable one.
CE covers the European Economic Area; UKCA covers Great Britain. Both are the manufacturer's own declaration that a product meets the requirements applying to it, and for most product categories nobody grants or checks them. Neither is a safety certification or a mark of quality, which is how both are widely read. UKCA's territory is Great Britain rather than the whole United Kingdom, because Northern Ireland follows the EU regime.
The EU energy label is mandatory and comparative: it grades a product on a lettered scale shown as coloured arrows, so two labelled products can be ranked against each other. Energy Star is voluntary and a threshold: a product either qualifies or does not, and the mark gives no indication of the margin. A product carrying both is making two different kinds of claim.
The glass and fork means the material is safe to touch food. It says nothing about heat, and a food-safe container can still melt or leach in a microwave. Wavy lines mean the maker considers it microwave-safe — which is not a certification, because no body defines that mark. If it matters, the manufacturer's instructions are the authority, not the symbol.