We'd like to use analytics cookies to understand which symbols people look up, so we know what to research next. They are not used for advertising and we set none of them unless you say yes. What we store.
Two flowering crosses so alike that heraldic writers disagree about individual examples.
Look at what the arms end in. A cross patonce widens outward and splits into three splayed points at each end; a cross fleury ends in a full fleur-de-lis. In practice the two are drawn so similarly that the standard authorities themselves differ over particular coats, and this is one of the genuinely unsettled distinctions in blazon.
Both are flowering crosses and the difference between splayed points and fleurs-de-lis is slight.
Drawn from the visual attributes recorded for each symbol. Only traits the two records disagree about are listed.
| Trait | Cross patonce | Cross fleury |
|---|---|---|
| Built from | crosses | crosses and plants |
| Cross patonce | Cross fleury | |
|---|---|---|
| Arm ends | Three outward-curving points | A stylised three-petalled lily |
| Arm width | Widens from the centre outward | May stay even and terminate in the lily |
| How settled the distinction is | Contested in individual cases | Contested in individual cases |
| Relationship (from Symbolwise's records) | Commonly confused with Cross fleury — Both are flowering crosses and the difference between splayed points and fleurs-de-lis is slight. | Commonly confused with Cross patonce — Both are flowering crosses and the difference between splayed points and fleurs-de-lis is slight. |
This is one of the few comparisons in the catalogue where the sources genuinely disagree with each other rather than with popular belief. Where a specific coat is at stake, the blazon rather than the painting is what settles it.
Arthur Charles Fox-Davies (1909), via Project Gutenberg · retrieved 2026-08-20
The standard English-language reference, and a period one: published 1909, so it states Edwardian English practice as though universal and is occasionally sharp about continental usage. Cited for blazon terminology, the conventional depiction of charges, and — notably — for its own detailed refutation of tincture symbolism.
Wikipedia · retrieved 2026-08-20
Tertiary reference. Cited for the blazon term, the conventional form of a charge and uncontested historical detail. Never cited for a claim that a charge carries a fixed symbolic meaning.
A bend runs from the top left of the shield to the bottom right as you look at it; a bend sinister runs the other way. The bend sinister is widely said to mark illegitimacy, and that is not quite right: the mark used in English practice was the narrower baton sinister, granted case by case rather than applied automatically. 'Bar sinister' is not a heraldic term at all — a bar is horizontal and cannot be sinister.
Count the points. Both have arms that narrow at the centre and widen outward. A cross pattée ends in four straight edges — four points in total. A Maltese cross has each outer edge notched inward, producing two points per arm and eight in all.
Size and feet. An eagle is a principal charge, drawn large with wings spread and talons showing. A martlet is small, swallow-like, and has no feet at all — tufts of feathers appear where the legs would be. The martlet is also a cadency mark: in English practice it identifies a fourth son.
Look at the front half. A griffin has an eagle's beaked head, pointed ears, feathered wings and taloned forelegs on a lion's hindquarters; a lion is a lion throughout. A wingless griffin is not an error either — the male griffin is a distinct charge drawn without wings and set about with spikes.