We'd like to use analytics cookies to understand which symbols people look up, so we know what to research next. They are not used for advertising and we set none of them unless you say yes. What we store.
Two near-identical rings on a food label that differ in how much of the product must actually be made in the named place.
The designation-of-origin ring requires every stage of production — growing, processing and preparation — to happen in the named region. The geographical-indication ring requires only one of those stages to happen there. Both protect the name rather than the recipe, so anyone may make the product and only a producer in the region may call it by the registered name; but a product carrying the geographical-indication ring may have been made largely somewhere else from ingredients grown somewhere else again.
Two similar coloured rings on a food label that differ in how much of production must occur in the named region.
Drawn from the visual attributes recorded for each symbol. Only traits the two records disagree about are listed.
| Trait | Protected designation mark | Protected geographical indication mark |
|---|---|---|
| Built from | circles and letter like | circles |
| Enclosing border | Sits inside a border | No enclosing border |
| Colour | Not colour-specific | blue and yellow |
| Protected designation mark | Protected geographical indication mark | |
|---|---|---|
| Production in the named place | Every stage. | At least one stage. |
| What is protected | The name, not the recipe. | The name, not the recipe. |
| What it tells a shopper | The whole product comes from the region named. | Something about the product connects it to the region; the ring does not say what. |
| Relationship (from Symbolwise's records) | Commonly confused with Protected geographical indication mark — Two similar coloured rings on a food label that differ in how much of production must occur in the named region. | Commonly confused with Protected designation mark — The geographical-indication ring requires one production stage in the region; the designation-of-origin ring requires all of them. |
Protected emblems and marks under international instruments
World Intellectual Property Organization · retrieved 2026-08-27
Cited for the registered or protected status of an emblem under an international instrument. Not legal advice, and not a statement about any use of a mark in any jurisdiction.
Wikipedia · retrieved 2026-08-22
Tertiary reference, cited for the conventional description of a mark, its usual name and where it is encountered. Where an issuing body defines the mark, that body is cited alongside and governs.
Biodegradable is close to meaningless on its own: almost everything degrades eventually, and the claim names no timescale and no conditions. Compostable states both. That gap is why unqualified biodegradability claims are restricted in several jurisdictions, and why a compostable mark is worth more than a biodegradable one.
CE covers the European Economic Area; UKCA covers Great Britain. Both are the manufacturer's own declaration that a product meets the requirements applying to it, and for most product categories nobody grants or checks them. Neither is a safety certification or a mark of quality, which is how both are widely read. UKCA's territory is Great Britain rather than the whole United Kingdom, because Northern Ireland follows the EU regime.
The organic scheme is the stricter of the two and prohibits synthetic inputs outright. The green food scheme permits limited use of them under controlled conditions, and exists as an achievable step between conventional production and organic certification. A product carrying the green food mark has met a real standard, and it is not the organic one.
The EU energy label is mandatory and comparative: it grades a product on a lettered scale shown as coloured arrows, so two labelled products can be ranked against each other. Energy Star is voluntary and a threshold: a product either qualifies or does not, and the mark gives no indication of the margin. A product carrying both is making two different kinds of claim.