We'd like to use analytics cookies to understand which symbols people look up, so we know what to research next. They are not used for advertising and we set none of them unless you say yes. What we store.
One claims the material can be recycled; the other says whether it is actually collected.
The three chasing arrows are a claim about the material: this can be recycled, in principle, somewhere. The on-pack wording panel — widely recycled, check locally, do not recycle — is a claim about collection, and it names the component, because a bottle, its sleeve and its cap are frequently three different materials with three different answers. Standing at a bin, the second is the useful one, and shoppers treat the two as interchangeable.
The loop claims the material is recyclable; the wording panel says whether it is actually collected.
Drawn from the visual attributes recorded for each symbol. Only traits the two records disagree about are listed.
| Trait | Recycling symbol | On-pack recycling label |
|---|---|---|
| Built from | triangles and arrows | squares and letter like |
| Enclosing border | Sits inside a border | No enclosing border |
| Symmetry | radial | none |
| Orientation | orientation independent | upright |
| Recycling symbol | On-pack recycling label | |
|---|---|---|
| Claim about | The material | The collection |
| Applies to | Usually the pack as a whole | A named component — bottle, sleeve, lid, tray |
| Varies by postcode | No | Yes, which is its purpose |
| Also carries | A percentage inside the loop, where the pack is made from recycled material | Nothing further — the wording is the message |
| Relationship (from Symbolwise's records) | Commonly confused with On-pack recycling label — The loop claims the material is recyclable; the wording panel says whether it is actually collected. | Commonly confused with Recycling symbol — One claims the material is recyclable; the other says whether it is actually collected. |
Wikipedia · retrieved 2026-07-26
Wikipedia · retrieved 2026-08-22
Tertiary reference, cited for the conventional description of a mark, its usual name and where it is encountered. Where an issuing body defines the mark, that body is cited alongside and governs.
Look at what the loop is drawn on. On a container it marks a place: put recyclable waste here. On packaging it makes a claim about the material itself — and, notoriously, a bare loop is not a promise that the item is collected for recycling where you live. One is a direction; the other is an assertion about a substance.
The Green Dot tells you nothing about whether the packaging can be recycled — it only means the producer paid into a packaging-recovery financing scheme. The three-arrow recycling loop is the one that makes a recyclability claim. Two interlocking arrows in a circle is the Green Dot; three chasing arrows in a triangle is the recycling symbol.
Check for a number. The bare loop claims the item is recyclable — something you can do with it in future. The same loop with a percentage claims how much recycled material it already contains — something already true about it. Forward-looking versus backward-looking, in the same graphic.
Look for a number. Chasing arrows with a numeral inside are a resin identification code: they say which plastic the item is made of and promise nothing at all about whether anyone will collect it. Chasing arrows with no numeral are the Mobius loop, which does assert recyclability. The codes borrowed the arrows, and that borrowing is why the mistake is universal.